Corrigo vs Infor EAM: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.
Corrigo
Enterprise facilities management platform by JLL Technologies for large portfolios with vendor management and IoT capabilities.
Infor EAM
Enterprise asset management platform for utilities, mining, oil and gas, and manufacturing companies managing critical infrastructure.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Corrigo | Infor EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | National retail chains managing 500+ store locations with outsourced maintenance | Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud, on premise |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 7.3/10 | 7.9/10 |
Pros & Cons
Corrigo
Pros
- Best-in-class vendor management for organizations outsourcing maintenance across hundreds of locations
- Backed by JLL—built by people who manage millions of square feet of commercial real estate daily
- Analytics engine turns facilities spend data into actionable budget intelligence by location and trade
- IoT integration enables proactive maintenance from building sensors and connected equipment
- Processes 3M+ work orders annually—proven at scale for enterprise portfolios
Cons
- Overkill for organizations managing fewer than 50 locations—complexity without proportional benefit
- Pricing starts at ~$50/user/month and climbs steeply for enterprise IoT configurations
- Implementation takes months with dedicated project management—not a quick-start solution
- Interface prioritizes data density over simplicity, steep learning curve for new users
Infor EAM
Pros
- Industry-specific compliance modules for utilities, oil and gas, and nuclear regulations
- Reliability-centered maintenance with FMEA built into the workflow
- IoT and condition monitoring integration for predictive maintenance
- Mature platform with decades of experience in asset-intensive industries
Cons
- Implementation costs of $500K-$2M put it out of reach for most organizations
- Implementation timelines of 12-18 months require significant internal resources
- Interface is dated and complex compared to modern cloud-native CMMS tools
- Total cost of ownership (licensing + implementation + support) is substantial
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Corrigo | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Infor EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose Corrigo if...
National retail chains managing 500+ store locations with outsourced maintenance
Choose Infor EAM if...
Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.