Softabase

Corrigo vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Corrigo logo

Corrigo

7.3(245 reviews)

Enterprise facilities management platform by JLL Technologies for large portfolios with vendor management and IoT capabilities.

Planon logo

Planon

8.1(410 reviews)

Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.

Quick Comparison

AspectCorrigoPlanon
Best ForNational retail chains managing 500+ store locations with outsourced maintenanceCorporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloudcloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating7.3/108.1/10

Pros & Cons

Corrigo

Pros

  • Best-in-class vendor management for organizations outsourcing maintenance across hundreds of locations
  • Backed by JLL—built by people who manage millions of square feet of commercial real estate daily
  • Analytics engine turns facilities spend data into actionable budget intelligence by location and trade
  • IoT integration enables proactive maintenance from building sensors and connected equipment
  • Processes 3M+ work orders annually—proven at scale for enterprise portfolios

Cons

  • Overkill for organizations managing fewer than 50 locations—complexity without proportional benefit
  • Pricing starts at ~$50/user/month and climbs steeply for enterprise IoT configurations
  • Implementation takes months with dedicated project management—not a quick-start solution
  • Interface prioritizes data density over simplicity, steep learning curve for new users

Planon

Pros

  • Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
  • Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
  • Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
  • Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions

Cons

  • Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
  • Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
  • Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
  • Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Corrigocontact salesContact Sales
Planoncontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Corrigo if...

National retail chains managing 500+ store locations with outsourced maintenance

Learn More

Choose Planon if...

Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.