Softabase

CrashPlan vs NAKIVO: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

CrashPlan logo

CrashPlan

7.8(2,400 reviews)

Endpoint backup solution for businesses with unlimited cloud storage, continuous file protection, and centralized admin for distributed teams.

NAKIVO logo

NAKIVO

8.0(1,800 reviews)

VM backup and disaster recovery solution for VMware, Hyper-V, and Nutanix with affordable licensing and a clean, fast management interface.

Quick Comparison

AspectCrashPlanNAKIVO
Best ForRemote-first companies protecting employee laptops and desktops without on-premise backup infrastructureMid-market companies running VMware or Hyper-V that find Veeam too expensive for their VM count
Pricing ModelSubscriptionSubscription
Starting Price$10/mo$229/mo
Deploymentcloudon premise, cloud, hybrid
PlatformsWINDOWS, MAC, LINUXWEB, WINDOWS, LINUX
Rating7.8/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

CrashPlan

Pros

  • Unlimited cloud storage per device means you never choose between which files to protect
  • Continuous background backup catches every file change within minutes — no scheduled windows needed
  • Cross-platform restore works between Mac, Windows, and Linux machines seamlessly
  • Centralized admin console gives IT visibility into backup status across the entire device fleet
  • Simple per-device pricing at $10/month is straightforward with no hidden storage or bandwidth fees

Cons

  • Endpoint backup only — does not protect servers, VMs, databases, or SaaS application data
  • No local backup option — everything must go to CrashPlan cloud, requiring reliable internet
  • Initial backup of large datasets (500GB+) can take several days over standard broadband connections
  • No disaster recovery orchestration, bare-metal restore, or VM replication capabilities
  • Legal hold and unlimited versioning require the $15/device Professional plan

NAKIVO

Pros

  • Perpetual licensing at $229-599/socket is 30-40% cheaper than Veeam over a 3-year period
  • Web interface is noticeably faster and cleaner — creating backup jobs takes 3-4 clicks
  • Runs as a virtual appliance or on NAS devices eliminating the need for a dedicated backup server
  • Screenshot verification automatically tests backups by booting VMs and capturing proof of recovery
  • Instant VM recovery boots production VMs directly from backup storage with minimal downtime

Cons

  • No Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, or any SaaS application backup capabilities
  • Database-level granularity is limited — full VM restore only, no single-table recovery for Oracle or SQL
  • No built-in ransomware-specific features like immutable repositories or malware scanning
  • Partner and consultant ecosystem is much smaller than Veeam making support harder to find
  • Physical server backup works but is less mature and battle-tested than the VM backup features

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
CrashPlansubscription$10/mo
NAKIVOsubscription$229/mo

Our Verdict

Choose CrashPlan if...

Remote-first companies protecting employee laptops and desktops without on-premise backup infrastructure

Learn More

Choose NAKIVO if...

Mid-market companies running VMware or Hyper-V that find Veeam too expensive for their VM count

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.