Softabase

Eptura vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Eptura logo

Eptura

7.8(280 reviews)

Integrated facilities and asset management platform for corporate real estate, combining workplace management with maintenance operations.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Quick Comparison

AspectEpturaHxGN EAM
Best ForCorporate real estate teams managing large office portfolios across multiple locationsElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloudcloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating7.8/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

Eptura

Pros

  • Unique combination of facilities management and workplace management in a single platform
  • Space utilization data integrated with maintenance costs gives corporate real estate teams a full building picture
  • Strong multi-site reporting for portfolio managers overseeing many office locations
  • Condition-triggered space closures link maintenance status directly to room booking systems

Cons

  • Not deep enough for industrial or manufacturing maintenance—no meter-based PM or spare parts inventory
  • Technician mobile app is functional but less polished than UpKeep or Limble
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation—no self-serve option or published rates
  • Product integration from the iOffice/Condeco merger is still maturing in places

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Epturacontact salesContact Sales
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Eptura if...

Corporate real estate teams managing large office portfolios across multiple locations

Learn More

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.