Softabase

Facilio vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Facilio logo

Facilio

7.9(95 reviews)

IoT-driven property operations platform for commercial real estate and multi-site facility operators with predictive maintenance and energy monitoring.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Quick Comparison

AspectFacilioHxGN EAM
Best ForCommercial real estate operators managing portfolios of 5+ large buildingsElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloudcloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating7.9/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

Facilio

Pros

  • Built from the ground up for IoT—connects to 500+ protocols and BMS systems for real predictive maintenance
  • Combines energy monitoring and maintenance tracking in one platform—rare and valuable for large buildings
  • Strong for multi-site property operators managing portfolios of commercial buildings
  • Sensor-driven alerts catch equipment problems before failure rather than relying on schedules alone

Cons

  • Requires existing IoT infrastructure—teams without sensors and BMS systems cannot use its core features
  • No MRO inventory module—not suitable for manufacturing or industrial maintenance
  • Pricing is opaque and implementation is complex, requiring integration expertise
  • Not designed for traditional technician-driven work order management without IoT context

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Faciliocontact salesContact Sales
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Facilio if...

Commercial real estate operators managing portfolios of 5+ large buildings

Learn More

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.