Facilio vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Facilio
IoT-driven property operations platform for commercial real estate and multi-site facility operators with predictive maintenance and energy monitoring.

Planon
8.1(410 reviews)
Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Facilio | Planon |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Commercial real estate operators managing portfolios of 5+ large buildings | Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud, on premise, hybrid |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 7.9/10 | 8.1/10 |
Pros & Cons
Facilio
Pros
- Built from the ground up for IoT—connects to 500+ protocols and BMS systems for real predictive maintenance
- Combines energy monitoring and maintenance tracking in one platform—rare and valuable for large buildings
- Strong for multi-site property operators managing portfolios of commercial buildings
- Sensor-driven alerts catch equipment problems before failure rather than relying on schedules alone
Cons
- Requires existing IoT infrastructure—teams without sensors and BMS systems cannot use its core features
- No MRO inventory module—not suitable for manufacturing or industrial maintenance
- Pricing is opaque and implementation is complex, requiring integration expertise
- Not designed for traditional technician-driven work order management without IoT context
Planon
Pros
- Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
- Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
- Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
- Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions
Cons
- Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
- Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
- Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
- Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Facilio | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Planon | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose Facilio if...
You need Commercial real estate operators managing portfolios of 5+ large buildings and prefer contact sales pricing.
Choose Planon if...
You need Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally and prefer contact sales pricing.
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.