Softabase

Fiix CMMS vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Fiix CMMS logo

Fiix CMMS

8.3(750 reviews)

Cloud-based CMMS by Rockwell Automation with strong AI-powered maintenance scheduling and manufacturing integrations.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Quick Comparison

AspectFiix CMMSHxGN EAM
Best ForMid-market manufacturers wanting a credible path to IoT and condition-based maintenanceElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing ModelFreemiumContact Sales
Starting PriceFreeContact Sales
Deploymentcloudcloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating8.3/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

Fiix CMMS

Pros

  • Rockwell Automation backing gives it genuine industrial IoT integration capabilities
  • AI-powered PM scheduling (Fiix Foresight) actually optimizes intervals based on failure history
  • Generous free plan with two real users—good for evaluating before committing
  • Strong asset hierarchy management for complex multi-site manufacturing environments

Cons

  • Customer support response times have slowed since the Rockwell acquisition—a common complaint
  • Pricing jump from Basic to Professional is steep for mid-size teams watching budget
  • Inventory management is functional but lacks depth for complex spare-parts operations
  • Full IoT and condition-based maintenance requires Enterprise tier and additional configuration

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Fiix CMMSfreemiumFree0
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Fiix CMMS if...

Mid-market manufacturers wanting a credible path to IoT and condition-based maintenance

Learn More

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.