Softabase

Hammerhead CMMS vs Infor EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Hammerhead CMMS logo

Hammerhead CMMS

7.3(85 reviews)

Cloud CMMS for facilities and equipment maintenance with inspection checklists, parts inventory, and preventive scheduling.

Infor EAM logo

Infor EAM

7.9(380 reviews)

Enterprise asset management platform for utilities, mining, oil and gas, and manufacturing companies managing critical infrastructure.

Quick Comparison

AspectHammerhead CMMSInfor EAM
Best ForFacilities teams with 5-50 users managing building maintenanceElectric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting Price$25/moContact Sales
Deploymentcloudcloud, on premise
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating7.3/107.9/10

Pros & Cons

Hammerhead CMMS

Pros

  • Clean, minimalist interface that technicians learn in a single day without formal training
  • Inspection checklists with photo capture handle OSHA and insurance compliance needs
  • Preventive maintenance scheduling works reliably—set it and forget it
  • Mobile apps for iOS and Android function well offline in basements and equipment rooms
  • Pricing sits below $60/user/month, which is competitive for cloud CMMS

Cons

  • Very limited integrations—no native connections to accounting, ERP, or IoT platforms
  • Customization options are narrow compared to UpKeep or Fiix
  • No condition-based or predictive maintenance capabilities whatsoever
  • Reporting is functional but lacks interactive dashboards or real-time KPIs
  • API documentation is sparse, making custom development difficult

Infor EAM

Pros

  • Industry-specific compliance modules for utilities, oil and gas, and nuclear regulations
  • Reliability-centered maintenance with FMEA built into the workflow
  • IoT and condition monitoring integration for predictive maintenance
  • Mature platform with decades of experience in asset-intensive industries

Cons

  • Implementation costs of $500K-$2M put it out of reach for most organizations
  • Implementation timelines of 12-18 months require significant internal resources
  • Interface is dated and complex compared to modern cloud-native CMMS tools
  • Total cost of ownership (licensing + implementation + support) is substantial

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Hammerhead CMMScontact sales$25/mo
Infor EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Hammerhead CMMS if...

Facilities teams with 5-50 users managing building maintenance

Learn More

Choose Infor EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.