HxGN EAM vs IFS Ultimo: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

7.8(195 reviews)

Enterprise asset management (EAM) platform from IFS with work orders, HSE compliance, inventory, and GIS integration.

Aspect	HxGN EAM	IFS Ultimo
Best For	Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks	Utilities and energy companies managing thousands of infrastructure assets
Pricing Model	Contact Sales	Contact Sales
Starting Price	Contact Sales	Contact Sales
Deployment	cloud, on premise, hybrid	cloud, on premise
Platforms	WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS	WEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating	8.0/10	7.8/10

Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Deep asset hierarchy management handles the complexity that simpler CMMS tools cannot
HSE compliance is built into the platform core—risk assessments, permits-to-work, and incident reporting
GIS integration with Esri ArcGIS provides spatial asset views for infrastructure-heavy organizations
Backed by IFS with 5,000+ employees, ensuring long-term product viability and investment
Supports ISO 55000, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001 compliance with comprehensive audit trails
Condition monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities go beyond calendar-based scheduling

Implementation takes 4-8 months and typically costs $50,000-200,000 before license fees
Learning curve is steep—technicians need 2-4 weeks of training, administrators need more
Interface is dense and complex, designed for power users rather than casual operators
Pricing at €50-120/user/month puts it out of reach for small and mid-size maintenance teams
Overkill for organizations with fewer than 500 assets or simple maintenance requirements
Requires consulting budget for configuration, data migration, and customization

Product	Pricing Model	Starting Price
HxGN EAM	contact sales	Contact Sales
IFS Ultimo	contact sales	Contact Sales

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Choose IFS Ultimo if...

Utilities and energy companies managing thousands of infrastructure assets

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.