HxGN EAM vs Infor EAM: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.
HxGN EAM
8.0(290 reviews)
Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.
Infor EAM
Enterprise asset management platform for utilities, mining, oil and gas, and manufacturing companies managing critical infrastructure.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | HxGN EAM | Infor EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks | Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise, hybrid | cloud, on premise |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 8.0/10 | 7.9/10 |
Pros & Cons
HxGN EAM
Pros
- Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
- ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
- Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
- Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical
Cons
- Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
- Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
- Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
- Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down
Infor EAM
Pros
- Industry-specific compliance modules for utilities, oil and gas, and nuclear regulations
- Reliability-centered maintenance with FMEA built into the workflow
- IoT and condition monitoring integration for predictive maintenance
- Mature platform with decades of experience in asset-intensive industries
Cons
- Implementation costs of $500K-$2M put it out of reach for most organizations
- Implementation timelines of 12-18 months require significant internal resources
- Interface is dated and complex compared to modern cloud-native CMMS tools
- Total cost of ownership (licensing + implementation + support) is substantial
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| HxGN EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Infor EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose HxGN EAM if...
You need Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks and prefer contact sales pricing.
Choose Infor EAM if...
You need Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure and prefer contact sales pricing.
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.