Softabase

HxGN EAM vs ManagerPlus: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

ManagerPlus logo

ManagerPlus

7.5(310 reviews)

Fleet and equipment maintenance management with DOT compliance, fuel tracking, and facilities management for municipalities and utilities.

Quick Comparison

AspectHxGN EAMManagerPlus
Best ForElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networksMunicipal governments managing police, fire, and public works vehicle fleets
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloud, on premise, hybridcloud, on premise
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWSWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating8.0/107.5/10

Pros & Cons

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

ManagerPlus

Pros

  • Best-in-class fleet maintenance with genuine DOT compliance tracking and fuel management
  • Handles both fleet and facilities in one system—useful for municipal and utility organizations
  • IFS acquisition means long-term platform stability and enterprise backing
  • Strong for usage-based PM triggers (mileage, hours, meters) across vehicle fleets

Cons

  • Interface feels dated compared to modern CMMS tools like UpKeep or Limble
  • Support quality has been variable since the IFS acquisition in 2021
  • Integration with IFS Field Service Management is possible but complex
  • Facilities-only teams get more fleet features than they need

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales
ManagerPluscontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Choose ManagerPlus if...

Municipal governments managing police, fire, and public works vehicle fleets

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.