HxGN EAM vs MPulse Maintenance Management: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

HxGN EAM
8.0(290 reviews)
Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

MPulse Maintenance Management
Configurable CMMS for multi-industry maintenance teams with flexible work order management, PM scheduling, and asset tracking.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | HxGN EAM | MPulse Maintenance Management |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks | Public sector and government maintenance departments with complex approval workflows |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise, hybrid | cloud, on premise |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS | WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS |
| Rating | 8.0/10 | 7.9/10 |
Pros & Cons
HxGN EAM
Pros
- Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
- ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
- Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
- Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical
Cons
- Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
- Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
- Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
- Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down
MPulse Maintenance Management
Pros
- Highly configurable to non-standard workflows—adapts to government, education, and property management
- Custom report builder creates reports on any data field without SQL or developer help
- On-premise deployment option available for data residency requirements
- 30 years of product refinement gives it solid fundamentals in core CMMS functions
Cons
- UI is dated—the interface has not kept pace with modern design standards
- Mobile experience is functional but noticeably less polished than newer competitors
- No built-in MTBF/MTTR analytics—reliability engineering metrics require custom report building
- Smaller integration ecosystem compared to UpKeep, Limble, or eMaint
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| HxGN EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| MPulse Maintenance Management | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose HxGN EAM if...
Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Choose MPulse Maintenance Management if...
Public sector and government maintenance departments with complex approval workflows
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.