Softabase

HxGN EAM vs MPulse Maintenance Management: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

MPulse Maintenance Management logo

MPulse Maintenance Management

7.9(210 reviews)

Configurable CMMS for multi-industry maintenance teams with flexible work order management, PM scheduling, and asset tracking.

Quick Comparison

AspectHxGN EAMMPulse Maintenance Management
Best ForElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networksPublic sector and government maintenance departments with complex approval workflows
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloud, on premise, hybridcloud, on premise
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWSWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating8.0/107.9/10

Pros & Cons

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

MPulse Maintenance Management

Pros

  • Highly configurable to non-standard workflows—adapts to government, education, and property management
  • Custom report builder creates reports on any data field without SQL or developer help
  • On-premise deployment option available for data residency requirements
  • 30 years of product refinement gives it solid fundamentals in core CMMS functions

Cons

  • UI is dated—the interface has not kept pace with modern design standards
  • Mobile experience is functional but noticeably less polished than newer competitors
  • No built-in MTBF/MTTR analytics—reliability engineering metrics require custom report building
  • Smaller integration ecosystem compared to UpKeep, Limble, or eMaint

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales
MPulse Maintenance Managementcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Choose MPulse Maintenance Management if...

Public sector and government maintenance departments with complex approval workflows

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.