HxGN EAM vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

HxGN EAM
8.0(290 reviews)
Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Planon
8.1(410 reviews)
Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | HxGN EAM | Planon |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks | Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise, hybrid | cloud, on premise, hybrid |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 8.0/10 | 8.1/10 |
Pros & Cons
HxGN EAM
Pros
- Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
- ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
- Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
- Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical
Cons
- Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
- Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
- Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
- Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down
Planon
Pros
- Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
- Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
- Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
- Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions
Cons
- Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
- Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
- Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
- Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| HxGN EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Planon | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose HxGN EAM if...
Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Choose Planon if...
Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.