Softabase

HxGN EAM vs Ultimo: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Ultimo logo

Ultimo

7.5(340 reviews)

Enterprise asset management for complex environments with HSE, GIS integration, and strong preventive maintenance capabilities.

Quick Comparison

AspectHxGN EAMUltimo
Best ForElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networksEuropean healthcare organizations managing hospital and clinical equipment
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloud, on premise, hybridcloud, on premise
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWSWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating8.0/107.5/10

Pros & Cons

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Ultimo

Pros

  • HSE management built into the core—incident reporting, risk assessments, and permits to work alongside maintenance
  • GIS integration lets infrastructure-heavy organizations see assets on spatial maps
  • European headquarters and 14-language support ideal for EU organizations with GDPR requirements
  • Deep asset lifecycle management with total cost of ownership tracking per asset
  • Available both as cloud and on-premise for organizations with data sovereignty needs

Cons

  • Implementation takes 3-6 months—this is enterprise software, not a weekend setup
  • Pricing is opaque and requires sales engagement for any quote
  • Strongest in Europe—North American customers may find limited regional support
  • Overkill for small facilities or organizations with fewer than 500 tracked assets
  • The learning curve is significant; expect dedicated training for maintenance teams

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales
Ultimocontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Choose Ultimo if...

European healthcare organizations managing hospital and clinical equipment

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.