Softabase

Infor EAM vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Infor EAM logo

Infor EAM

7.9(380 reviews)

Enterprise asset management platform for utilities, mining, oil and gas, and manufacturing companies managing critical infrastructure.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Quick Comparison

AspectInfor EAMHxGN EAM
Best ForElectric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructureElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloud, on premisecloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating7.9/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

Infor EAM

Pros

  • Industry-specific compliance modules for utilities, oil and gas, and nuclear regulations
  • Reliability-centered maintenance with FMEA built into the workflow
  • IoT and condition monitoring integration for predictive maintenance
  • Mature platform with decades of experience in asset-intensive industries

Cons

  • Implementation costs of $500K-$2M put it out of reach for most organizations
  • Implementation timelines of 12-18 months require significant internal resources
  • Interface is dated and complex compared to modern cloud-native CMMS tools
  • Total cost of ownership (licensing + implementation + support) is substantial

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Infor EAMcontact salesContact Sales
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Infor EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure

Learn More

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.