Softabase

Infraspeak vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Infraspeak logo

Infraspeak

8.2(320 reviews)

CMMS and facilities management platform with native IoT integration, popular across Spain, Portugal, and Latin America.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Quick Comparison

AspectInfraspeakHxGN EAM
Best ForHotels, resorts, and hospitality groups needing facilities management with local EU complianceElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloudcloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating8.2/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

Infraspeak

Pros

  • EU data residency and GDPR-native architecture—no legal workarounds for European organizations
  • Native IoT sensor integration for condition-based and predictive maintenance
  • Hospitality and facilities sector expertise that generic CMMS tools cannot match
  • Local-language support in Spanish and Portuguese from a team that actually knows the markets

Cons

  • Pricing is not published—requires a sales call to get a quote, which slows budget planning
  • North American ERP integrations are limited and often require custom development
  • Less brand recognition outside Spain, Portugal, and Latin America may complicate procurement approvals
  • Module-based pricing can make costs difficult to predict as your needs expand

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Infraspeakcontact salesContact Sales
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Infraspeak if...

Hotels, resorts, and hospitality groups needing facilities management with local EU compliance

Learn More

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.