Softabase

Infraspeak vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Infraspeak logo

Infraspeak

8.2(320 reviews)

CMMS and facilities management platform with native IoT integration, popular across Spain, Portugal, and Latin America.

Planon logo

Planon

8.1(410 reviews)

Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.

Quick Comparison

AspectInfraspeakPlanon
Best ForHotels, resorts, and hospitality groups needing facilities management with local EU complianceCorporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloudcloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating8.2/108.1/10

Pros & Cons

Infraspeak

Pros

  • EU data residency and GDPR-native architecture—no legal workarounds for European organizations
  • Native IoT sensor integration for condition-based and predictive maintenance
  • Hospitality and facilities sector expertise that generic CMMS tools cannot match
  • Local-language support in Spanish and Portuguese from a team that actually knows the markets

Cons

  • Pricing is not published—requires a sales call to get a quote, which slows budget planning
  • North American ERP integrations are limited and often require custom development
  • Less brand recognition outside Spain, Portugal, and Latin America may complicate procurement approvals
  • Module-based pricing can make costs difficult to predict as your needs expand

Planon

Pros

  • Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
  • Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
  • Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
  • Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions

Cons

  • Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
  • Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
  • Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
  • Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Infraspeakcontact salesContact Sales
Planoncontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Infraspeak if...

Hotels, resorts, and hospitality groups needing facilities management with local EU compliance

Learn More

Choose Planon if...

Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.