Mainsaver vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Mainsaver

7.0(180 reviews)

Industrial CMMS built for complex, asset-heavy environments like utilities, mining, and heavy manufacturing since 1986.

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Aspect	Mainsaver	HxGN EAM
Best For	Utilities managing water treatment, wastewater, and power generation facilities	Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing Model	Contact Sales	Contact Sales
Starting Price	Contact Sales	Contact Sales
Deployment	cloud, on premise	cloud, on premise, hybrid
Platforms	WEB	WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating	7.0/10	8.0/10

38 years of industrial maintenance domain expertise baked into the product
Handles complex multi-trade work orders that simpler CMMS tools cannot manage
Asset hierarchy supports 10+ levels of parent-child relationships for complex plants
Both cloud and on-premise deployment options for organizations with data sovereignty needs
PM scheduling with time-based, meter-based, and condition-based triggers

Interface looks and feels dated—training new users takes longer than modern alternatives
No native mobile app comparable to cloud-first CMMS vendors like UpKeep or Limble
Small company (11-50 employees) means limited support bandwidth
Overkill for commercial facilities, offices, or light-duty maintenance environments
Reporting requires more manual configuration than modern analytics-focused tools

Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Product	Pricing Model	Starting Price
Mainsaver	contact sales	Contact Sales
HxGN EAM	contact sales	Contact Sales

Choose Mainsaver if...

Utilities managing water treatment, wastewater, and power generation facilities

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.