Mainsaver vs Infor EAM: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.
Mainsaver
Industrial CMMS built for complex, asset-heavy environments like utilities, mining, and heavy manufacturing since 1986.
Infor EAM
Enterprise asset management platform for utilities, mining, oil and gas, and manufacturing companies managing critical infrastructure.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Mainsaver | Infor EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Utilities managing water treatment, wastewater, and power generation facilities | Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise | cloud, on premise |
| Platforms | WEB | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 7.0/10 | 7.9/10 |
Pros & Cons
Mainsaver
Pros
- 38 years of industrial maintenance domain expertise baked into the product
- Handles complex multi-trade work orders that simpler CMMS tools cannot manage
- Asset hierarchy supports 10+ levels of parent-child relationships for complex plants
- Both cloud and on-premise deployment options for organizations with data sovereignty needs
- PM scheduling with time-based, meter-based, and condition-based triggers
Cons
- Interface looks and feels dated—training new users takes longer than modern alternatives
- No native mobile app comparable to cloud-first CMMS vendors like UpKeep or Limble
- Small company (11-50 employees) means limited support bandwidth
- Overkill for commercial facilities, offices, or light-duty maintenance environments
- Reporting requires more manual configuration than modern analytics-focused tools
Infor EAM
Pros
- Industry-specific compliance modules for utilities, oil and gas, and nuclear regulations
- Reliability-centered maintenance with FMEA built into the workflow
- IoT and condition monitoring integration for predictive maintenance
- Mature platform with decades of experience in asset-intensive industries
Cons
- Implementation costs of $500K-$2M put it out of reach for most organizations
- Implementation timelines of 12-18 months require significant internal resources
- Interface is dated and complex compared to modern cloud-native CMMS tools
- Total cost of ownership (licensing + implementation + support) is substantial
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Mainsaver | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Infor EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose Mainsaver if...
Utilities managing water treatment, wastewater, and power generation facilities
Choose Infor EAM if...
Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.