Mainsaver vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Mainsaver
Industrial CMMS built for complex, asset-heavy environments like utilities, mining, and heavy manufacturing since 1986.

Planon
8.1(410 reviews)
Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Mainsaver | Planon |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Utilities managing water treatment, wastewater, and power generation facilities | Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise | cloud, on premise, hybrid |
| Platforms | WEB | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 7.0/10 | 8.1/10 |
Pros & Cons
Mainsaver
Pros
- 38 years of industrial maintenance domain expertise baked into the product
- Handles complex multi-trade work orders that simpler CMMS tools cannot manage
- Asset hierarchy supports 10+ levels of parent-child relationships for complex plants
- Both cloud and on-premise deployment options for organizations with data sovereignty needs
- PM scheduling with time-based, meter-based, and condition-based triggers
Cons
- Interface looks and feels dated—training new users takes longer than modern alternatives
- No native mobile app comparable to cloud-first CMMS vendors like UpKeep or Limble
- Small company (11-50 employees) means limited support bandwidth
- Overkill for commercial facilities, offices, or light-duty maintenance environments
- Reporting requires more manual configuration than modern analytics-focused tools
Planon
Pros
- Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
- Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
- Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
- Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions
Cons
- Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
- Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
- Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
- Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Mainsaver | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Planon | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose Mainsaver if...
Utilities managing water treatment, wastewater, and power generation facilities
Choose Planon if...
Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.