Softabase

Mainsaver vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Mainsaver logo

Mainsaver

7.0(180 reviews)

Industrial CMMS built for complex, asset-heavy environments like utilities, mining, and heavy manufacturing since 1986.

Planon logo

Planon

8.1(410 reviews)

Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.

Quick Comparison

AspectMainsaverPlanon
Best ForUtilities managing water treatment, wastewater, and power generation facilitiesCorporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloud, on premisecloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEBWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating7.0/108.1/10

Pros & Cons

Mainsaver

Pros

  • 38 years of industrial maintenance domain expertise baked into the product
  • Handles complex multi-trade work orders that simpler CMMS tools cannot manage
  • Asset hierarchy supports 10+ levels of parent-child relationships for complex plants
  • Both cloud and on-premise deployment options for organizations with data sovereignty needs
  • PM scheduling with time-based, meter-based, and condition-based triggers

Cons

  • Interface looks and feels dated—training new users takes longer than modern alternatives
  • No native mobile app comparable to cloud-first CMMS vendors like UpKeep or Limble
  • Small company (11-50 employees) means limited support bandwidth
  • Overkill for commercial facilities, offices, or light-duty maintenance environments
  • Reporting requires more manual configuration than modern analytics-focused tools

Planon

Pros

  • Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
  • Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
  • Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
  • Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions

Cons

  • Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
  • Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
  • Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
  • Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Mainsavercontact salesContact Sales
Planoncontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Mainsaver if...

Utilities managing water treatment, wastewater, and power generation facilities

Learn More

Choose Planon if...

Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.