Softabase

MaintStar vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

MaintStar logo

MaintStar

7.0(45 reviews)

Maintenance management built for government and public works agencies with GIS integration and citizen request portals.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Quick Comparison

AspectMaintStarHxGN EAM
Best ForMunicipal public works departments managing roads, water, and sewer infrastructureElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloud, on premisecloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEBWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating7.0/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

MaintStar

Pros

  • Purpose-built for government—understands budget cycles, council reporting, and citizen service workflows
  • Deep Esri ArcGIS integration maps assets, work orders, and maintenance history geographically
  • Fleet maintenance module is built in rather than bolted on as an afterthought
  • Citizen request routing connects public complaints directly into the work order pipeline
  • Infrastructure asset lifecycle tracking supports long-term capital planning

Cons

  • Completely unsuitable for private companies—every feature is designed around government operations
  • Interface looks dated and lags behind modern SaaS design standards
  • Implementation takes 3-6 months due to government data complexity
  • Web-only platform with no native mobile apps for field crews
  • Limited to US and Canadian government markets with no international presence

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
MaintStarcontact salesContact Sales
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose MaintStar if...

Municipal public works departments managing roads, water, and sewer infrastructure

Learn More

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.