MaintStar vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

MaintStar
Maintenance management built for government and public works agencies with GIS integration and citizen request portals.

HxGN EAM
8.0(290 reviews)
Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | MaintStar | HxGN EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Municipal public works departments managing roads, water, and sewer infrastructure | Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise | cloud, on premise, hybrid |
| Platforms | WEB | WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS |
| Rating | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
Pros & Cons
MaintStar
Pros
- Purpose-built for government—understands budget cycles, council reporting, and citizen service workflows
- Deep Esri ArcGIS integration maps assets, work orders, and maintenance history geographically
- Fleet maintenance module is built in rather than bolted on as an afterthought
- Citizen request routing connects public complaints directly into the work order pipeline
- Infrastructure asset lifecycle tracking supports long-term capital planning
Cons
- Completely unsuitable for private companies—every feature is designed around government operations
- Interface looks dated and lags behind modern SaaS design standards
- Implementation takes 3-6 months due to government data complexity
- Web-only platform with no native mobile apps for field crews
- Limited to US and Canadian government markets with no international presence
HxGN EAM
Pros
- Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
- ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
- Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
- Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical
Cons
- Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
- Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
- Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
- Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| MaintStar | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| HxGN EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose MaintStar if...
Municipal public works departments managing roads, water, and sewer infrastructure
Choose HxGN EAM if...
Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.