Softabase

MicroMain vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

MicroMain logo

MicroMain

7.5(185 reviews)

Veteran CMMS and facility management software serving government, education, and healthcare since 1991. Cloud or on-premise.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Quick Comparison

AspectMicroMainHxGN EAM
Best ForGovernment agencies needing proven, compliance-ready CMMS vendorsElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloud, on premisecloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, WINDOWSWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating7.5/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

MicroMain

Pros

  • 30+ years in the market—the asset data model handles edge cases newer tools haven't seen
  • On-premise deployment option for organizations that can't or won't use cloud-only solutions
  • Deep preventive maintenance engine with meter-based, calendar-based, and condition-based triggers
  • Included inventory management with min/max reorder points and purchase requisition workflows
  • Strong track record with government, education, and healthcare compliance requirements

Cons

  • User interface feels dated compared to modern CMMS tools like Limble, Coast, or UpKeep
  • Mobile app is functional but not as polished as mobile-first competitors
  • Implementation takes 4-8 weeks—no weekend self-service setup option
  • Pricing ($40-80/user/month) is mid-range but significantly above simpler alternatives
  • Smaller user community and fewer online resources than market leaders

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
MicroMaincontact salesContact Sales
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose MicroMain if...

Government agencies needing proven, compliance-ready CMMS vendors

Learn More

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.