Softabase

SmartFlow vs Shepherd Veterinary: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

SmartFlow logo

SmartFlow

8.3(420 reviews)

Digital patient flowsheets for veterinary hospitals that replace paper ICU charts with real-time electronic monitoring.

Shepherd Veterinary logo

Shepherd Veterinary

8.2(380 reviews)

Modern cloud veterinary platform with AI-powered workflows, smart charting, and integrated client communication from $300/month.

Quick Comparison

AspectSmartFlowShepherd Veterinary
Best ForEmergency and specialty veterinary hospitals where paper flowsheets are a daily workflow bottleneckTech-forward veterinary practices wanting AI-assisted charting to reduce documentation burden
Pricing ModelSubscriptionSubscription
Starting Price$150/mo$300/mo
Deploymentcloudcloud
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating8.3/108.2/10

Pros & Cons

SmartFlow

Pros

  • Eliminates paper flowsheet errors — digital tracking prevents missed treatments, illegible handwriting, and lost charts
  • Real-time treatment status visible to the entire care team from any device in the hospital
  • Integrates with existing PIMS (Cornerstone, eVetPractice, etc.) rather than requiring a platform switch
  • Medication scheduling with automated alerts prevents missed doses and dosing errors in critical patients
  • Treatment charges sync to PIMS billing automatically, capturing revenue that paper charts often miss

Cons

  • Not a standalone PIMS — requires a separate system for scheduling, billing, medical records, and other core functions
  • Only valuable for practices with hospitalized patients — general practices without ICU/hospital have no use for it
  • Adds another monthly cost ($150/month) on top of existing PIMS subscription
  • Staff adoption requires changing deeply ingrained paper-based habits which can be initially resistant
  • Integration quality varies by PIMS — some connections are tighter than others

Shepherd Veterinary

Pros

  • AI-assisted charting saves 15-30 minutes daily on medical record documentation per veterinarian
  • Modern interface designed in the 2020s — genuinely enjoyable to use compared to legacy systems
  • Smart procedure workflows reduce clicks and pre-load expected diagnostics based on visit type and patient history
  • Built by veterinarians who understand the daily frustrations of existing veterinary software
  • Integrated client communication (text, email) keeps pet owner interactions within the medical record

Cons

  • Premium pricing at $300-500/month is higher than budget alternatives like NaVetor or eVetPractice
  • Newer platform with a smaller user community and evolving integration ecosystem
  • Some specialty workflows may not be fully developed yet as the platform matures
  • AI charting accuracy requires review — don't blindly accept AI-generated medical notes without verification
  • Less proven at scale compared to Cornerstone with its 30+ years of production reliability

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
SmartFlowsubscription$150/mo
Shepherd Veterinarysubscription$300/mo

Our Verdict

Choose SmartFlow if...

Emergency and specialty veterinary hospitals where paper flowsheets are a daily workflow bottleneck

Learn More

Choose Shepherd Veterinary if...

Tech-forward veterinary practices wanting AI-assisted charting to reduce documentation burden

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.