SmartFlow vs Shepherd Veterinary: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.
SmartFlow
8.3(420 reviews)
Digital patient flowsheets for veterinary hospitals that replace paper ICU charts with real-time electronic monitoring.
Shepherd Veterinary
8.2(380 reviews)
Modern cloud veterinary platform with AI-powered workflows, smart charting, and integrated client communication from $300/month.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | SmartFlow | Shepherd Veterinary |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Emergency and specialty veterinary hospitals where paper flowsheets are a daily workflow bottleneck | Tech-forward veterinary practices wanting AI-assisted charting to reduce documentation burden |
| Pricing Model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Starting Price | $150/mo | $300/mo |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 |
Pros & Cons
SmartFlow
Pros
- Eliminates paper flowsheet errors — digital tracking prevents missed treatments, illegible handwriting, and lost charts
- Real-time treatment status visible to the entire care team from any device in the hospital
- Integrates with existing PIMS (Cornerstone, eVetPractice, etc.) rather than requiring a platform switch
- Medication scheduling with automated alerts prevents missed doses and dosing errors in critical patients
- Treatment charges sync to PIMS billing automatically, capturing revenue that paper charts often miss
Cons
- Not a standalone PIMS — requires a separate system for scheduling, billing, medical records, and other core functions
- Only valuable for practices with hospitalized patients — general practices without ICU/hospital have no use for it
- Adds another monthly cost ($150/month) on top of existing PIMS subscription
- Staff adoption requires changing deeply ingrained paper-based habits which can be initially resistant
- Integration quality varies by PIMS — some connections are tighter than others
Shepherd Veterinary
Pros
- AI-assisted charting saves 15-30 minutes daily on medical record documentation per veterinarian
- Modern interface designed in the 2020s — genuinely enjoyable to use compared to legacy systems
- Smart procedure workflows reduce clicks and pre-load expected diagnostics based on visit type and patient history
- Built by veterinarians who understand the daily frustrations of existing veterinary software
- Integrated client communication (text, email) keeps pet owner interactions within the medical record
Cons
- Premium pricing at $300-500/month is higher than budget alternatives like NaVetor or eVetPractice
- Newer platform with a smaller user community and evolving integration ecosystem
- Some specialty workflows may not be fully developed yet as the platform matures
- AI charting accuracy requires review — don't blindly accept AI-generated medical notes without verification
- Less proven at scale compared to Cornerstone with its 30+ years of production reliability
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| SmartFlow | subscription | $150/mo |
| Shepherd Veterinary | subscription | $300/mo |
Our Verdict
Choose SmartFlow if...
Emergency and specialty veterinary hospitals where paper flowsheets are a daily workflow bottleneck
Choose Shepherd Veterinary if...
Tech-forward veterinary practices wanting AI-assisted charting to reduce documentation burden
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.