Softabase

Ultimo vs Fiix CMMS: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Ultimo logo

Ultimo

7.5(340 reviews)

Enterprise asset management for complex environments with HSE, GIS integration, and strong preventive maintenance capabilities.

Fiix CMMS logo

Fiix CMMS

8.3(750 reviews)

Cloud-based CMMS by Rockwell Automation with strong AI-powered maintenance scheduling and manufacturing integrations.

Quick Comparison

AspectUltimoFiix CMMS
Best ForEuropean healthcare organizations managing hospital and clinical equipmentMid-market manufacturers wanting a credible path to IoT and condition-based maintenance
Pricing ModelContact SalesFreemium
Starting PriceContact SalesFree
Deploymentcloud, on premisecloud
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating7.5/108.3/10

Pros & Cons

Ultimo

Pros

  • HSE management built into the core—incident reporting, risk assessments, and permits to work alongside maintenance
  • GIS integration lets infrastructure-heavy organizations see assets on spatial maps
  • European headquarters and 14-language support ideal for EU organizations with GDPR requirements
  • Deep asset lifecycle management with total cost of ownership tracking per asset
  • Available both as cloud and on-premise for organizations with data sovereignty needs

Cons

  • Implementation takes 3-6 months—this is enterprise software, not a weekend setup
  • Pricing is opaque and requires sales engagement for any quote
  • Strongest in Europe—North American customers may find limited regional support
  • Overkill for small facilities or organizations with fewer than 500 tracked assets
  • The learning curve is significant; expect dedicated training for maintenance teams

Fiix CMMS

Pros

  • Rockwell Automation backing gives it genuine industrial IoT integration capabilities
  • AI-powered PM scheduling (Fiix Foresight) actually optimizes intervals based on failure history
  • Generous free plan with two real users—good for evaluating before committing
  • Strong asset hierarchy management for complex multi-site manufacturing environments

Cons

  • Customer support response times have slowed since the Rockwell acquisition—a common complaint
  • Pricing jump from Basic to Professional is steep for mid-size teams watching budget
  • Inventory management is functional but lacks depth for complex spare-parts operations
  • Full IoT and condition-based maintenance requires Enterprise tier and additional configuration

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Ultimocontact salesContact Sales
Fiix CMMSfreemiumFree0

Our Verdict

Choose Ultimo if...

European healthcare organizations managing hospital and clinical equipment

Learn More

Choose Fiix CMMS if...

Mid-market manufacturers wanting a credible path to IoT and condition-based maintenance

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.