Ultimo vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Ultimo
Enterprise asset management for complex environments with HSE, GIS integration, and strong preventive maintenance capabilities.

HxGN EAM
8.0(290 reviews)
Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Ultimo | HxGN EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | European healthcare organizations managing hospital and clinical equipment | Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise | cloud, on premise, hybrid |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID | WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS |
| Rating | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
Pros & Cons
Ultimo
Pros
- HSE management built into the core—incident reporting, risk assessments, and permits to work alongside maintenance
- GIS integration lets infrastructure-heavy organizations see assets on spatial maps
- European headquarters and 14-language support ideal for EU organizations with GDPR requirements
- Deep asset lifecycle management with total cost of ownership tracking per asset
- Available both as cloud and on-premise for organizations with data sovereignty needs
Cons
- Implementation takes 3-6 months—this is enterprise software, not a weekend setup
- Pricing is opaque and requires sales engagement for any quote
- Strongest in Europe—North American customers may find limited regional support
- Overkill for small facilities or organizations with fewer than 500 tracked assets
- The learning curve is significant; expect dedicated training for maintenance teams
HxGN EAM
Pros
- Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
- ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
- Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
- Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical
Cons
- Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
- Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
- Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
- Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Ultimo | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| HxGN EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose Ultimo if...
European healthcare organizations managing hospital and clinical equipment
Choose HxGN EAM if...
Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.