Pricing
subscription
Best For
Mid-market and enterprise companies managing 3+ compliance frameworks simultaneously
Rating
8.2/10
Last Updated
Mar 2026
TL;DR
Hyperproof is built for companies juggling multiple compliance frameworks simultaneously. SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, NIST, PCI DSS, CMMC — Hyperproof maps controls across all of them so you satisfy five frameworks with one set of evidence. The cross-framework mapping is the standout feature. Where Vanta and Drata focus on automating evidence collection for cloud-native startups, Hyperproof serves mid-market and enterprise organizations with 3-10+ active frameworks. Pricing starts around $15,000/year. The platform is less automated than Vanta (more manual evidence management) but more flexible for complex compliance programs with on-premises systems and custom controls.
What is Hyperproof?
Multi-Framework Compliance, Simplified
The average mid-market company manages 4-6 compliance frameworks simultaneously. Without a tool, each framework maintains separate control lists, separate evidence folders, separate review cycles. Hyperproof's cross-framework mapping eliminates this duplication. One control satisfying SOC 2's CC6.1 also maps to ISO 27001's A.9.1.1 and HIPAA's 164.312(a)(1). Collect evidence once, apply it everywhere.
The Control-Centric Approach
Unlike Vanta and Drata which automate monitoring of cloud infrastructure, Hyperproof takes a control-centric approach. Define your controls. Map them to frameworks. Assign owners. Schedule evidence collection (automated or manual). Track effectiveness. This approach works for any type of control — cloud, on-premises, physical security, HR policies, legal obligations. It's framework-agnostic by design.
Workspaces for Complex Organizations
Hyperproof's workspace model handles multi-entity organizations. Different business units, subsidiaries, or product lines can maintain separate compliance programs while sharing common controls at the parent level. This organizational flexibility is rare in compliance tools and matters enormously for companies with complex corporate structures.
Where Hyperproof Requires More Effort
The trade-off for flexibility is effort. Hyperproof doesn't auto-connect to your AWS account and start monitoring (the way Vanta does). You'll spend more time setting up controls, mapping frameworks, and establishing evidence collection workflows. The learning curve is steeper. For a 20-person startup pursuing a first SOC 2, Vanta is faster. For a 2,000-person company managing SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, PCI, and CMMC across three business units, Hyperproof is the right tool.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Best cross-framework mapping in the market — one evidence set satisfies 5+ frameworks simultaneously
- Workspace model handles multi-entity organizations that other compliance tools can't
- Works with any control type (cloud, on-premises, physical, policy) — not limited to cloud-native
- Custom framework support lets you map proprietary controls to internal policies
- Risk register and effectiveness tracking provide genuine GRC capabilities beyond just compliance
Cons
- Less automated than Vanta or Drata — more manual effort for evidence collection and setup
- Learning curve is steeper due to the control-centric approach and framework mapping complexity
- Pricing at $15,000+/year is expensive for small companies with simple compliance needs
- Integration library is smaller than Vanta's 300+ — some evidence requires manual uploads
- Overkill for companies with a single framework — Vanta or Drata are simpler choices
Hyperproof Pricing
Team
- 2 frameworks
- Cross-framework mapping
- Evidence management
- Control tracking
- Basic integrations
- Email support
Business
- 5+ frameworks
- Automated evidence collection
- Risk register
- Custom frameworks
- Workspaces
- Priority support
Enterprise
- Unlimited frameworks
- Advanced automation
- SSO/SAML
- SLA guarantee
- Custom integrations
- Dedicated CSM
Pricing last verified: March 25, 2026
Who is Hyperproof Best For?
- Mid-market and enterprise companies managing 3+ compliance frameworks simultaneously
- Organizations with complex corporate structures needing multi-entity compliance management
- Companies with on-premises infrastructure and custom controls that cloud-focused tools can't monitor
- Compliance teams wanting genuine GRC capabilities (risk register, effectiveness tracking) beyond audit prep
Technical Details
The Bottom Line
Hyperproof scores 8.2/10. It stands out for best cross-framework mapping in the market — one evidence set satisfies 5+ frameworks simultaneously. Best suited for mid-market and enterprise companies managing 3+ compliance frameworks simultaneously. Keep in mind that less automated than vanta or drata — more manual effort for evidence collection and setup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on editorial analysis