Fiix CMMS vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.
Fiix CMMS
8.3(750 reviews)
Cloud-based CMMS by Rockwell Automation with strong AI-powered maintenance scheduling and manufacturing integrations.
HxGN EAM
8.0(290 reviews)
Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Fiix CMMS | HxGN EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Mid-market manufacturers wanting a credible path to IoT and condition-based maintenance | Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Free | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud, on premise, hybrid |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID | WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS |
| Rating | 8.3/10 | 8.0/10 |
Pros & Cons
Fiix CMMS
Pros
- Rockwell Automation backing gives it genuine industrial IoT integration capabilities
- AI-powered PM scheduling (Fiix Foresight) actually optimizes intervals based on failure history
- Generous free plan with two real users—good for evaluating before committing
- Strong asset hierarchy management for complex multi-site manufacturing environments
Cons
- Customer support response times have slowed since the Rockwell acquisition—a common complaint
- Pricing jump from Basic to Professional is steep for mid-size teams watching budget
- Inventory management is functional but lacks depth for complex spare-parts operations
- Full IoT and condition-based maintenance requires Enterprise tier and additional configuration
HxGN EAM
Pros
- Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
- ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
- Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
- Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical
Cons
- Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
- Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
- Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
- Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Fiix CMMS | freemium | Free0 |
| HxGN EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose Fiix CMMS if...
You need Mid-market manufacturers wanting a credible path to IoT and condition-based maintenance and prefer freemium pricing.
Choose HxGN EAM if...
You need Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks and prefer contact sales pricing.
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.