HxGN EAM vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

HxGN EAM
8.0(290 reviews)
Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Planon
8.1(410 reviews)
Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | HxGN EAM | Planon |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks | Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise, hybrid | cloud, on premise, hybrid |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 8.0/10 | 8.1/10 |
Pros & Cons
HxGN EAM
Pros
- Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
- ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
- Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
- Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical
Cons
- Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
- Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
- Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
- Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down
Planon
Pros
- Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
- Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
- Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
- Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions
Cons
- Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
- Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
- Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
- Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| HxGN EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Planon | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose HxGN EAM if...
You need Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks and prefer contact sales pricing.
Choose Planon if...
You need Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally and prefer contact sales pricing.
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.