Infor EAM vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.
Infor EAM
Enterprise asset management platform for utilities, mining, oil and gas, and manufacturing companies managing critical infrastructure.
Planon
8.1(410 reviews)
Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Infor EAM | Planon |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure | Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise | cloud, on premise, hybrid |
| Platforms | WEB, IOS, ANDROID | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 7.9/10 | 8.1/10 |
Pros & Cons
Infor EAM
Pros
- Industry-specific compliance modules for utilities, oil and gas, and nuclear regulations
- Reliability-centered maintenance with FMEA built into the workflow
- IoT and condition monitoring integration for predictive maintenance
- Mature platform with decades of experience in asset-intensive industries
Cons
- Implementation costs of $500K-$2M put it out of reach for most organizations
- Implementation timelines of 12-18 months require significant internal resources
- Interface is dated and complex compared to modern cloud-native CMMS tools
- Total cost of ownership (licensing + implementation + support) is substantial
Planon
Pros
- Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
- Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
- Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
- Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions
Cons
- Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
- Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
- Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
- Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| Infor EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Planon | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose Infor EAM if...
You need Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure and prefer contact sales pricing.
Choose Planon if...
You need Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally and prefer contact sales pricing.
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.