FieldAware vs FieldEdge: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

FieldAware

7.5(210 reviews)

Mobile-first field service management platform focused on work orders, scheduling, and analytics. Contact sales for pricing (~$70-120/user/month).

7.9(980 reviews)

HVAC and plumbing FSM with strong flat-rate pricing integration and ServiceTitan-like revenue tracking. Built for established trade contractors.

Aspect	FieldAware	FieldEdge
Best For	Mid-size commercial service companies with 15-100 technicians prioritizing mobile field workflows	HVAC and plumbing contractors with 10-50 technicians needing flat-rate pricing with upsell workflows
Pricing Model	Contact Sales	Subscription
Starting Price	Contact Sales	Contact Sales
Deployment	cloud	cloud
Platforms	WEB, IOS, ANDROID	WEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating	7.5/10	7.9/10

Best-in-class mobile app with genuine offline capability—designed for real field conditions, not just demo environments
Custom forms builder handles complex inspection workflows without developer involvement
Asset management with lifecycle tracking is stronger than most mid-market FSM competitors
Open API and pre-built integrations with Salesforce, QuickBooks, and major ERP systems

Back-office scheduling and dispatch tools lack the sophistication of top-tier competitors like ServiceTitan
Pricing at ~$70-120/user/month sits in an awkward middle ground between affordable and enterprise-grade
Reporting requires more effort than it should to build custom views and actionable dashboards
Smaller company with fewer resources than competitors backed by larger organizations
No publicly available pricing makes it hard to evaluate cost before engaging with sales

Flat-rate Coolfront pricebook integration is best-in-class for HVAC and plumbing service calls
Technician revenue tracking and scorecards help managers identify top performers and coaching needs
Decades of HVAC/plumbing workflow depth that newer platforms built for broader markets lack
Service agreement module with automated renewal and scheduling handles recurring revenue reliably

Mobile app UX feels dated—more taps required than Jobber or Housecall Pro for standard field tasks
Pricing is not transparent—requires a demo call to get quotes, which slows evaluation
Less suitable for field service industries outside HVAC and plumbing trade work
Customer support has received mixed reviews; complex issues can take longer than expected to resolve

Product	Pricing Model	Starting Price
FieldAware	contact sales	Contact Sales
FieldEdge	subscription	Contact Sales

Choose FieldAware if...

Mid-size commercial service companies with 15-100 technicians prioritizing mobile field workflows

Choose FieldEdge if...

HVAC and plumbing contractors with 10-50 technicians needing flat-rate pricing with upsell workflows

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.