TMA Systems vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

TMA Systems

7.2(155 reviews)

Enterprise CMMS and facility management software for higher education, healthcare, and government since 1988.

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Aspect	TMA Systems	HxGN EAM
Best For	Large universities managing 50+ buildings with space utilization tracking requirements	Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing Model	Contact Sales	Contact Sales
Starting Price	Contact Sales	Contact Sales
Deployment	cloud, on premise	cloud, on premise, hybrid
Platforms	WEB	WEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating	7.2/10	8.0/10

Combined CMMS and CAFM capabilities—space management, capital planning, and maintenance in one platform
Deep higher education expertise with FICM compliance reporting that federal funding requires
On-premise deployment option for organizations with data sovereignty or security requirements
Capital planning module helps document deferred maintenance backlogs with FCI calculations
Independent company since 1988—no acquisition risk or product roadmap uncertainty

User interface feels dated—enterprise software aesthetics that younger technicians find unintuitive
Implementation complexity requires 6-12 weeks of project management for full deployment
Limited brand recognition outside higher education and government markets
Mobile app is functional but not as polished as mobile-first CMMS competitors
Smaller integration ecosystem compared to more modern platforms

Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Product	Pricing Model	Starting Price
TMA Systems	contact sales	Contact Sales
HxGN EAM	contact sales	Contact Sales

Choose TMA Systems if...

Large universities managing 50+ buildings with space utilization tracking requirements

Choose HxGN EAM if...

Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.