TMA Systems vs Infor EAM: Complete Comparison 2026
An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.
TMA Systems
Enterprise CMMS and facility management software for higher education, healthcare, and government since 1988.
Infor EAM
Enterprise asset management platform for utilities, mining, oil and gas, and manufacturing companies managing critical infrastructure.
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | TMA Systems | Infor EAM |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Large universities managing 50+ buildings with space utilization tracking requirements | Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure |
| Pricing Model | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Starting Price | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Deployment | cloud, on premise | cloud, on premise |
| Platforms | WEB | WEB, IOS, ANDROID |
| Rating | 7.2/10 | 7.9/10 |
Pros & Cons
TMA Systems
Pros
- Combined CMMS and CAFM capabilities—space management, capital planning, and maintenance in one platform
- Deep higher education expertise with FICM compliance reporting that federal funding requires
- On-premise deployment option for organizations with data sovereignty or security requirements
- Capital planning module helps document deferred maintenance backlogs with FCI calculations
- Independent company since 1988—no acquisition risk or product roadmap uncertainty
Cons
- User interface feels dated—enterprise software aesthetics that younger technicians find unintuitive
- Implementation complexity requires 6-12 weeks of project management for full deployment
- Limited brand recognition outside higher education and government markets
- Mobile app is functional but not as polished as mobile-first CMMS competitors
- Smaller integration ecosystem compared to more modern platforms
Infor EAM
Pros
- Industry-specific compliance modules for utilities, oil and gas, and nuclear regulations
- Reliability-centered maintenance with FMEA built into the workflow
- IoT and condition monitoring integration for predictive maintenance
- Mature platform with decades of experience in asset-intensive industries
Cons
- Implementation costs of $500K-$2M put it out of reach for most organizations
- Implementation timelines of 12-18 months require significant internal resources
- Interface is dated and complex compared to modern cloud-native CMMS tools
- Total cost of ownership (licensing + implementation + support) is substantial
Pricing Comparison
| Product | Pricing Model | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| TMA Systems | contact sales | Contact Sales |
| Infor EAM | contact sales | Contact Sales |
Our Verdict
Choose TMA Systems if...
Large universities managing 50+ buildings with space utilization tracking requirements
Choose Infor EAM if...
Electric and water utilities managing transmission and distribution infrastructure
Still Not Sure?
Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.