Pricing
freemium
Best For
Teams already using Gmail/Google Workspace for email
Rating
8.3/10
Last Updated
Mar 2026
TL;DR
Hiver is the smartest option if your team already lives in Gmail and doesn't want to learn a new tool. It layers help desk features directly inside Gmail — shared inboxes, ticket assignment, SLA tracking, and automation. The free plan for up to 10 users is genuinely useful, and paid plans start at $19/user/month.
What is Hiver?
A Help Desk That Lives Inside Gmail
Hiver took a bet in 2011 that not everyone wants to leave their inbox to manage support. That bet paid off. Instead of making you switch to a separate platform, Hiver adds help desk functionality as a Gmail extension. Your agents never leave the Gmail interface they already know.
How the Shared Inbox Works
When an email hits your shared address (support@, info@, etc.), it appears in every team member's Gmail with Hiver's sidebar showing assignment status, tags, and notes. One click assigns the email to a specific person. Internal notes live right next to the email thread — your customer never sees them. Collision detection prevents two agents from replying to the same email simultaneously. It's surprisingly elegant for something bolted onto Gmail.
Automation and SLA Tracking
Round-robin assignment distributes incoming emails evenly across your team. You can build rules that auto-tag, auto-assign, or escalate based on subject line, sender domain, or time elapsed. SLA policies trigger alerts when response or resolution times approach their limits. For a Gmail plugin, the automation depth is impressive — it covers 80% of what standalone tools like Freshdesk offer.
Analytics and Live Chat
The analytics dashboard tracks first response time, resolution time, agent workload, and customer satisfaction (via CSAT surveys embedded in email closings). Hiver also added live chat in 2022 — a widget on your website that feeds conversations into the same Gmail-based workflow. It's not as feature-rich as Intercom's chat, but it keeps everything in one place.
The Gmail Dependency
The obvious limitation is Gmail lock-in. If you use Outlook, Yahoo, or any other email client, Hiver won't work. Period. The $22M in funding has gone toward deepening the Gmail integration rather than building a standalone product. For Gmail shops, that's a feature. For everyone else, it's a dealbreaker.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Zero learning curve if your team already uses Gmail
- Free plan genuinely useful for up to 10 users — not a crippled trial
- Collision detection stops agents from duplicating replies
- Internal notes and email assignments feel native to Gmail
- Live chat feeds into the same Gmail workflow, keeping everything unified
- SLA and automation features rival standalone help desks
Cons
- Only works with Gmail — if you use Outlook or another client, forget it
- No standalone web app — you depend entirely on the Gmail extension
- Live chat features are basic compared to dedicated tools like Intercom
- Limited customization since everything runs within Gmail constraints
- Advanced automation and AI features are locked behind the $49/user Elite plan
Hiver Pricing
Lite
- Everything in Free
- SLA management
- Round-robin assignment
- Custom tags
- CSAT surveys
Pro
- Everything in Lite
- Automation rules
- Live chat
- Advanced analytics
- Integrations (Salesforce, Jira)
Elite
- Everything in Pro
- Skill-based routing
- Custom roles
- Priority support
- AI summarization
- Custom reports
Pricing last verified: March 22, 2026
Who is Hiver Best For?
- Teams already using Gmail/Google Workspace for email
- Small to mid-size companies wanting a help desk without switching tools
- Startups needing a free shared inbox solution
- Support teams with 5-50 agents
Technical Details
The Bottom Line
Hiver scores 8.3/10. It stands out for zero learning curve if your team already uses gmail. Best suited for teams already using gmail/google workspace for email. Keep in mind that only works with gmail — if you use outlook or another client, forget it. There is a free plan to get started.
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on editorial analysis


