Softabase

Facilio vs Planon: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Facilio logo

Facilio

7.9(95 reviews)

IoT-driven property operations platform for commercial real estate and multi-site facility operators with predictive maintenance and energy monitoring.

Planon logo

Planon

8.1(410 reviews)

Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.

Quick Comparison

AspectFacilioPlanon
Best ForCommercial real estate operators managing portfolios of 5+ large buildingsCorporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloudcloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID
Rating7.9/108.1/10

Pros & Cons

Facilio

Pros

  • Built from the ground up for IoT—connects to 500+ protocols and BMS systems for real predictive maintenance
  • Combines energy monitoring and maintenance tracking in one platform—rare and valuable for large buildings
  • Strong for multi-site property operators managing portfolios of commercial buildings
  • Sensor-driven alerts catch equipment problems before failure rather than relying on schedules alone

Cons

  • Requires existing IoT infrastructure—teams without sensors and BMS systems cannot use its core features
  • No MRO inventory module—not suitable for manufacturing or industrial maintenance
  • Pricing is opaque and implementation is complex, requiring integration expertise
  • Not designed for traditional technician-driven work order management without IoT context

Planon

Pros

  • Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
  • Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
  • Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
  • Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions

Cons

  • Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
  • Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
  • Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
  • Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Faciliocontact salesContact Sales
Planoncontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Facilio if...

You need Commercial real estate operators managing portfolios of 5+ large buildings and prefer contact sales pricing.

Learn More

Choose Planon if...

You need Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally and prefer contact sales pricing.

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.