Pricing
freemium
Best For
Fully remote teams working across many time zones
Rating
8.0/10
Last Updated
May 2026
TL;DR
Twist, from the makers of Todoist, is team chat reorganized around threads instead of a live feed. It's built for async-first and remote teams who want focused, organized conversations without the Slack firehose. The trade-off: it's quiet by design, and that calm isn't for everyone.
What is Twist?
Twist comes from Doist, the fully remote company behind Todoist. The team built Twist because they were a distributed workforce across dozens of time zones, and real-time chat tools were quietly destroying their ability to do deep work. Twist launched in 2017 as their answer: a messaging app where async is the default, not the exception.
What Makes Twist Special
Threads are the core unit. Instead of a fast-scrolling channel feed where context evaporates, every conversation in Twist is a titled thread inside a channel. You open a thread, read the whole discussion top to bottom, and reply when you've actually thought about it. Nothing disappears upward. A decision from three months ago is right where you left it.
There's a separate "Messages" area for quick one-to-one or small-group conversations, which keeps the threaded channels clean. Notifications are calm and batched. There's no pressure to be "online." For a team spread across eight time zones, that's the whole value proposition — work moves forward without everyone needing to be awake at once.
Day-to-Day Experience
It feels slower than Slack, and that's intentional. You write more considered messages because the format invites it. The interface is clean and uncluttered. Search works well across all that organized history. Integrations exist but the directory is modest.
The Honest Trade-offs
Twist is niche. If your team thrives on real-time back-and-forth, Twist will feel sluggish and oddly quiet. There's no native video or voice calling, so you'll still need Zoom or similar. The integration ecosystem is small. And adoption requires genuine buy-in — half a team using it async while the other half wants instant replies just creates friction.
Who Should Choose Twist
Fully remote and distributed teams working across many time zones, async-first companies, and teams that have consciously decided real-time chat is hurting their focus. If you're trying to build a calmer, more deliberate communication culture, Twist is one of the only tools designed from the ground up for exactly that.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Threaded structure keeps conversations organized and easy to follow
- Async-first design protects deep work and focus time
- Calm, batched notifications with no online-status pressure
- Search works well across years of organized history
- Clean, uncluttered interface that invites considered writing
Cons
- No native video or voice calling — you still need Zoom or similar
- Feels slow for teams that thrive on real-time conversation
- Small integration ecosystem compared to Slack
- Requires genuine team buy-in to work well
- Free plan limits history to one month
Ready to try Twist?
Free plan available to get started
Twist Pricing
Free
- 1 month of comments and message history
- Up to 5 integrations
- Unlimited users and threads
- iOS and Android apps
Unlimited
- Unlimited message history
- Unlimited integrations
- Unlimited guests
- Priority support
Pricing last verified: May 14, 2026
Who is Twist Best For?
- Fully remote teams working across many time zones
- Async-first companies building a calmer communication culture
- Teams that find real-time chat is hurting their focus
- Distributed organizations that value organized, threaded discussions
Technical Details
The Bottom Line
Twist scores 8/10. It stands out for threaded structure keeps conversations organized and easy to follow. Best suited for fully remote teams working across many time zones. Keep in mind that no native video or voice calling — you still need zoom or similar. There is a free plan to get started.
Popular Comparisons
Ready to try Twist?
Free plan available to get started
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on editorial analysis