Softabase

Planon vs HxGN EAM: Complete Comparison 2026

An in-depth comparison of features, pricing, and user experience to help you make the right choice.

Planon logo

Planon

8.1(410 reviews)

Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader for corporate real estate, space management, and facilities management.

HxGN EAM logo

HxGN EAM

8.0(290 reviews)

Enterprise EAM with native GIS integration for utilities, mining, oil & gas, and public sector asset management.

Quick Comparison

AspectPlanonHxGN EAM
Best ForCorporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globallyElectric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks
Pricing ModelContact SalesContact Sales
Starting PriceContact SalesContact Sales
Deploymentcloud, on premise, hybridcloud, on premise, hybrid
PlatformsWEB, IOS, ANDROIDWEB, IOS, ANDROID, WINDOWS
Rating8.1/108.0/10

Pros & Cons

Planon

Pros

  • Gartner Magic Quadrant IWMS leader—best-in-class for corporate real estate and facilities management
  • Lease administration and space management depth that no CMMS-only tool can match
  • Built-in sustainability and ESG reporting for energy tracking and carbon footprint management
  • Strong European presence with multilingual support across EU jurisdictions

Cons

  • Implementation takes 9-18 months and requires certified implementation partners—not a self-service tool
  • Designed for FM directors managing office portfolios, not maintenance technicians on the shop floor
  • Annual cost typically $150K-$500K+—far beyond what most organizations need for basic maintenance management
  • Mobile UX reflects IWMS complexity rather than field technician usability

HxGN EAM

Pros

  • Native GIS integration—geospatial asset mapping that no other EAM vendor delivers as completely
  • ISO 55000 and NERC-CIP compliance workflows built for regulated utility and infrastructure sectors
  • Deep lineage from Infor EAM with decades of enterprise reliability in utilities and mining
  • Strong in mining and oil & gas where remote asset geography is operationally critical

Cons

  • Extremely expensive—$100K-$500K+ annually before implementation costs are added
  • Implementation takes 12-24 months and requires specialized system integrators
  • Hexagon's broader strategic focus means EAM is not always their top development priority
  • Completely unsuitable for organizations below enterprise scale—the cost-benefit ratio breaks down

Pricing Comparison

ProductPricing ModelStarting Price
Planoncontact salesContact Sales
HxGN EAMcontact salesContact Sales

Our Verdict

Choose Planon if...

You need Corporate real estate teams at large organizations managing multi-site office portfolios globally and prefer contact sales pricing.

Learn More

Choose HxGN EAM if...

You need Electric and water utilities managing geographically distributed infrastructure networks and prefer contact sales pricing.

Learn More

Still Not Sure?

Explore more alternatives or read in-depth reviews to make your decision.