Pricing
free trial
Best For
Agencies and consulting firms that bill clients by the hour
Rating
8.4/10
Last Updated
Mar 2026
TL;DR
Harvest has been in the time tracking game since 2006. It's the choice for agencies and consulting firms that need tracking plus invoicing in one tool. The interface is clean, the invoicing workflow is smooth, and the Forecast add-on handles resource planning. At $10.80/seat/month with no free tier (just a free solo plan), it's positioned as a premium option for professional services.
What is Harvest?
The Professional Services Standard
Harvest launched in 2006 in New York. Nearly two decades of focus on one thing: helping professional services teams track time and bill clients. Over 70,000 companies trust it. No pivot to employee monitoring. No feature bloat. Just tracking, invoicing, and reporting done right.
Time Tracking That Doesn't Fight You
The timer is simple. Start it, pick a project and task, add a note. Stop it. The weekly timesheet view lets you fill in hours retroactively — most Harvest users prefer this over real-time timers. Browser extensions and integrations with Asana, Basecamp, Trello, and Slack mean you don't need to leave your workflow. Reminders nudge forgetful team members before the week closes.
Invoicing Built Right In
This is where Harvest separates itself from Toggl and Clockify. Convert tracked hours into invoices with a few clicks. Set different bill rates per person, per project, per task. Clients get professional invoices with detailed hour breakdowns. Stripe and PayPal integration lets clients pay directly. Automatic payment reminders chase overdue invoices so you don't have to.
Forecast: The Resource Planning Add-On
Harvest Forecast ($5/person/month extra) adds visual resource scheduling. See who's available, who's overbooked, and where projects are heading. It's not a full project management tool, but for staffing decisions it's excellent. Agencies planning sprints or allocating consultants find it invaluable.
The Pricing Conversation
Harvest dropped their multi-tier pricing. Now it's just Free (1 seat, 2 projects) or Pro ($10.80/seat/month, everything). That simplicity is refreshing, but means a team of 20 pays $216/month. Toggl's free plan covers 5 users, and Clockify is free for unlimited users. Harvest bets that built-in invoicing justifies the premium. For firms billing $100-300/hour, it absolutely does.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Best-in-class invoicing built directly into the time tracker — no separate tool needed
- Clean weekly timesheet view that most professional services teams prefer over timers
- Forecast add-on provides genuine resource planning and team capacity visibility
- Stripe and PayPal integration lets clients pay invoices online immediately
- Nearly 20 years of stability — no pivot chasing, no feature bloat, reliable and focused
Cons
- No free plan for teams — only a 1-seat free plan with 2-project limit
- $10.80/seat/month adds up fast for larger teams compared to free alternatives
- No employee monitoring features — no screenshots, app tracking, or activity levels
- Forecast add-on costs $5/person/month extra on top of the base price
- Limited project management — tasks are basic, no Gantt charts or dependencies
Harvest Pricing
Pro
- Unlimited seats
- Unlimited projects
- Time tracking & timesheets
- Invoicing & payments
- Expense tracking
- Reports & analysis
- Team permissions
- Integrations
Pricing last verified: March 25, 2026
Who is Harvest Best For?
- Agencies and consulting firms that bill clients by the hour
- Professional services teams needing integrated time tracking and invoicing
- Companies wanting resource planning with the Forecast add-on
- Firms that value simplicity and stability over feature count
Technical Details
The Bottom Line
Harvest scores 8.4/10. It stands out for best-in-class invoicing built directly into the time tracker — no separate tool needed. Best suited for agencies and consulting firms that bill clients by the hour. Keep in mind that no free plan for teams — only a 1-seat free plan with 2-project limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on editorial analysis