Pricing
freemium
Best For
Startups and indie hackers needing a free messaging solution
Rating
8.0/10
Last Updated
Mar 2026
TL;DR
Crisp is a French messaging platform that packs a surprising amount into its free tier: 2 seats, live chat, and a shared inbox. The paid plans ($25-95/workspace/month) add chatbots, a knowledge base, video calls, and a status page. It's not trying to compete with Zendesk on features — it's going after the simplicity market. And it's winning there.
What is Crisp?
A Refreshingly Simple Messaging Tool
Crisp was founded in 2015 in Nantes, France, by a small team that wanted to build the messaging tool they wished existed. No venture capital bloat, no feature creep for enterprise check boxes. The result is a lean platform used by over 500,000 businesses — mostly startups, indie hackers, and small teams who value simplicity over enterprise features.
The Free Plan Actually Works
Most "free" help desk plans are crippled previews. Crisp's free tier gives you 2 seats, live chat, a shared inbox, and mobile apps. That's enough for a two-person startup to handle customer communication professionally without spending anything. The chat widget is lightweight, customizable, and loads fast.
Shared Inbox for Everything
The shared inbox pulls in messages from live chat, email, Facebook Messenger, Instagram DMs, WhatsApp, Twitter, SMS, and Telegram. Every conversation lands in one view. You can assign, tag, and add internal notes. For teams of 5-20 people, this replaces the chaos of forwarding emails and sharing login credentials.
Chatbot and Knowledge Base
The chatbot builder uses a visual flow editor. You can create automated sequences for lead qualification, FAQ answers, and appointment booking. The knowledge base (Pro plan and up) lets you publish help articles that the chatbot can reference. It's not as powerful as Intercom's bots, but it's straightforward to set up.
Unique Features Worth Mentioning
Crisp includes a few things you won't find in most competitors at this price: MagicBrowse lets agents co-browse with visitors in real time. Video calls work directly from the chat widget. The status page feature (Unlimited plan) lets you publish uptime information — handy for SaaS companies. These aren't gimmicks; they're genuinely useful for small teams that don't want to stitch together five different tools.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Free plan includes 2 seats, live chat, and shared inbox — no time limit
- Per-workspace pricing instead of per-agent means predictable costs as you grow
- MagicBrowse co-browsing and video calls are rare at this price point
- Supports 12+ messaging channels including WhatsApp, Telegram, and SMS
- Status page feature eliminates the need for a separate uptime monitoring tool
- Clean, modern UI that takes minutes to set up
Cons
- Chatbot capabilities are basic compared to Intercom or Tidio
- Reporting and analytics are limited, especially on lower plans
- No phone/voice channel support
- Small company (11-50 employees) means support response times can vary
- Advanced routing rules only available on the Unlimited plan ($95/month)
Crisp Pricing
Pro
- Everything in Basic
- Chatbot builder
- Knowledge base
- Audio messages
- Canned responses
- Customization
Unlimited
- Everything in Pro
- Status page
- Video calls
- MagicBrowse co-browsing
- Analytics
- Auto-responder
- Routing rules
- Unlimited chat history
Pricing last verified: March 22, 2026
Who is Crisp Best For?
- Startups and indie hackers needing a free messaging solution
- Small teams (2-20 people) wanting one tool for all messaging channels
- SaaS companies that need a status page alongside customer support
- Budget-conscious businesses that want per-workspace pricing
Technical Details
The Bottom Line
Crisp scores 8/10. It stands out for free plan includes 2 seats, live chat, and shared inbox — no time limit. Best suited for startups and indie hackers needing a free messaging solution. Keep in mind that chatbot capabilities are basic compared to intercom or tidio. There is a free plan to get started.
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on editorial analysis


